Archive for the ‘What If’ Category

Victory

4 July 2016

The rest of the book – many chapters, hours of the audio book – consists basically of LRH wisdom and ideas regarding how to organize a universe based on a permanent peace economy. This all in the form of fictional events, speeches and narrative.

The arrangement was that if any of the major societies of all the universes ever got belligerent, they would all be blown to smithereens by special weapons teleported to their capital cities and related locations from secret locations throughout the universes. Their first job, therefore, was to police each other and ensure none got out of hand. This is the “carry a very big stick” part. That the secret teleport locations were never constructed was of little consequence; the “big stick” worked.

The grizzled and craven diplomats that had to be convinced that peace would work in place of their planned wars to solve the economic collapse brought about by the demise of the Psychlo Empire were perhaps the biggest challenge. LRH’s account of these negotiations was tense and intriguing.

The “Selachee” bankers were handled by extremely cunning means, and ultimately became friendly.

Further discoveries were made about the history of Psychlo which made it clearer what had happened there.

A new kind of surgery was invented which allowed the few remaining Psychlos to have their brain implants removed and feel comfortable among other sentient beings for the very first time.

A combination of technical innovation – which had actually been suppressed by the Psychlos – and the unleashed creative power of countless ordinary people finally released from the terrible lie that they were no more than “mere animals” resulted in a level of prosperity and happiness throughout the universes unlike any had ever known or anything that had ever been recorded in millions of years of histories.

Perhaps this could some day come to be. I know the author wanted to encourage us to at least try.

Advertisements

Institutionalized Crime: Banking

4 July 2016
shark

Member of animal superorder Selachii.

In Part 28 Jonnie Tyler finally finds out who the “small gray man” is. He is a banker, portrayed by LRH as a member of the alien race called the Selachee.

The planet Psychlo, as Jonnie has just learned on his own by sending fancy video cameras out into space using the transshipment platform, was blown up a little over a year ago when Jonnie managed to secretly send a load of bomb-filled coffins there. The huge nuclear bombs blew down into Psychlo, held in on top by a tremendously strong protection shield. The explosions reached its molten core and eventually turned the whole planet into a small star.

Psychlo was the home planet of Intergalactic Mining, which had taken out a loan from their bank about a thousand years earlier to purchase Earth from the government. The Psychlo Empire had discovered the planet after finding a map of its location on a space probe launched from Earth. According to the bank, Psychlo had “legal title” to the planet, which had been transferred to Intergalactic at the time of the sale. The mortgage had a payoff period of over 2,000 years. The company had stopped payments on the mortgage a year ago, when Johnny had succeeded – unknowingly – to destroy its home planet.

The bank was looking for the new legal holder of the title so it could serve loan delinquency papers on them.

Does this sound ridiculous? It happens every day on Earth, on a much smaller scale.

Of course, at the level of a planet, it is ridiculous. Not because of the concept of “legal title” but because of how the law favors appropriation of lands (or planets, or space) by force, with no further responsibilities or liabilities attached. This is law written by the conqueror and is unjust on the face of it. Yet we deal with such laws every day.

Did the native inhabitants of any lands on Earth have any say in the “laws” that governed the disposition of those lands when Europeans overran them by force? Of course not. They were required to learn European law to retain any control at all over any piece of their former territories. From a more humanitarian viewpoint – or even from the viewpoint of “natural law” – what occurred when Europe overran the Americas was theft, plain and simple. In all of the Americas, there is very little if any “legal title” that can be traced back to a real, human, transaction between friendly parties.

But banks set up a legal system that would favor their interests. And I can only imagine that they used various forms of blackmail and propaganda, as needed, to bring pressure on the writers of those laws.

I haven’t finished re-reading (listening to) the book yet, and I don’t remember how Jonnie solves this problem.

There are obvious basic principles of respect and responsibility that could be applied in such situations. The first and most obvious is that an inhabited planet should not be considered “fair game.” If it can be demonstrated that any individual, group, or society is occupying and taking care of an area of space, that gives them “title” to that area. For many reasons, use of land – or space – cannot be governed by quite the same rules that cover personal property such as clothing, furniture, tools. Yet the bankers have distorted law in that direction, while overlooking certain obvious contradictions.

The result in many places is that land can be bought and sold as if it were private property, while if stolen by certain protected parties, will be considered as belonging to them regardless of the act of theft.

I you want to wreck your shirt and buy a new one every week, that’s your choice. But you can’t treat land – or planets – that way. A conqueror that kills a planet or its inhabitants, or sells them into slavery, has no right to legal title and incurs a debt to the inhabitants or their survivors. That our laws should protect such a conqueror is only institutionalized crime.

My study of this subject has only taken me as far as Henry George’s book Progress and Poverty. I found his basic ideas very persuasive, and I recommend the book. Law, however, can always be broken and re-written by force. This is an irreducible fact of life. So, to go far, one must speak softly, but carry a very big stick.

The ET Problem

3 July 2016

In Part 21 of the story, LRH begins to introduce us to the ETs who have begun to swarm around Earth. He gives descriptions of body appearances which I believe are largely fanciful. For example, the Tolnep have bodies composed of something akin to stainless steel, and have poisonous fangs like snakes. He also gives short descriptions of their ships which I believe are less fanciful: sphere-shaped; triangle-shaped; cigar-shaped. A key ET – the “small gray man” – remains unidentified, though he seems to hold some sort of senior intelligence and/or diplomatic function.

All these races are of course “space opera,” which is to say that their economies are involved in inter-planetary trade. They have – we can imagine – commercial ships and, in the case presented here, military ships which are there to protect their lines of “commerce.”

In the situation presented by this story, each ET group has a “niche” in the overall inter-galactic economy, which is dominated by the Psychlos due to their apparent monopoly on the technology of teleportation, usually called “transshipment.” Transshipment allows the Psychlos to place military assets wherever they are needed instantly and with no sign of approach, giving them a tremendous political advantage.

The economic niches occupied by the others are briefly enumerated at the beginning of Part 22: the Tolneps are involved in the slave trade; the Hawvins trade in copper and silver; the Bolbods trade in used machinery; the Jambitchow seem to be pirates. There are also the Hockners, who seem to be aspiring political rivals to the Psychlos.

Relative Importances

Battlefield Earth traces the physical – and intellectual – journey of a single very brave individual through many problems of survival. At every level he finds urges – very human urges – to succumb as well as to survive. As sickening as the urge to succumb is to an individual very much committed to survival, it is certainly quite real. Yet it signals the existence of what is known as a “game.” A game is an illusion of conflict for the entertainment of the players, where no actual conflict exists or needs to exist. It is clear from research that life’s unit beings are immortal. Thus any situation where “survival” becomes important must exist at the level of game, and not be, ultimately, real. In playing the various games of life this is worth keeping in mind, as silly and esoteric as it may sound to you.

The trick to handling our situation on Earth would be to rehabilitate our awareness of certain basics of existence that we decided to ignore in order to have a game.

Criminality in Government

2 July 2016

In Parts 17 and 18 of Battlefield Earth, LRH introduces us to the problem of criminality in government in the person of character Brown Limper Staffor.

Some may think that Brown Limper is a huge exaggeration of what really can happen to people. But I don’t think so. Brown Limper was totally delusional. He believed that all his problems and odd cravings were caused by good and honest people who were the real criminals. He plotted, almost ceaselessly, to destroy the lives and works of good people. In this case, Brown Limper’s target was our hero.

This attitude is characteristic of the criminal mind. A criminal let loose in government can wreak havoc. If the honest people cannot identify and expose such people, whole governments, whole societies, can be suborned and nullified – or destroyed outright – suddenly or over a long period.

The common tools of such individuals are lies cloaked in veils of truth. They can be very convincing. When fed in through the news media, or “respectable experts” many take such lies as truth. But of course, if looked into closely, they can be demonstrated to be lies. So there are always some persons who become aware of the criminality and attempt to challenge it. Depending on how deep it goes, exposure can result in success for the honest people, or their death – usually indirectly through “accidents.”

All this and more is illustrated in various ways in this story.

First stage of Earth recovery

1 July 2016

In Part 12 of Battlefield Earth, the men take their first step in their plan to defeat the invaders from “Psychlo.”

Key to the operation was the “transhipment” of a cargo of nuclear bombs – hidden in caskets of dead employees – hoping to blow the home planet to kingdom come.

In order to prevent the nuclear bombs from blowing up on Earth by mistake, the bombs had to be armed at the very last minute, when the “transhipment” was irreversible. This was our hero’s job, and as with every step in the story, he pulled it off, with difficulty, at the very last minute.

After many harrowing problems, the author gives us a break, and describes the work of the Scottish-led “World Federation for the Unification of the Human Race.”

By Part 15 we are well-introduced to Hubbard’s ideas about how to bring peace to a world – and universe – all too “human.” A Russian introduces one important aspect of this towards the end of this part: Put rival groups in charge of each other’s “defense” bases. Then if someone tries to use an installation for offensive purposes, chances were that the personnel would be being asked to fire on their own people, and refuse!

Johnny recruits the Scots

29 June 2016

You all know why I am here.
I want 50 young men who are able, courageous, and strong, to go on a crusade to rid the world of the demon up there who does not speak our language (referring to Terl and his kind).

I feel it is necessary to to tell you the character of this demon so you can help me. He is treacherous, vicious, sadistic, and devious. He lies from choice even when the truth will serve.

The mining company that conquered this planet in ages past has equipment and technology beyond those of man. Planes in the air, machines to drill the earth, gasses and guns that can slaughter whole cities. Man has been deprived of this planet by those creatures. The men who volunteer to come with me will learn to use those tools, fly those planes, man those guns!

Our chances are not in our favor. Many of us may die before this is through.

Our race is growing fewer in numbers. In coming years we may be gone forever. But even though the odds are against us, at least let it be said that we took this small last chance and tried.

– from Part 6, Chapter 11

With this, our hero’s first political speech, he recruited not 50, but all thousand or so attending the meeting. Of them he took 83 to American with him in Terl’s personnel carrier. The rest vowed to prepare themselves to strike – or help in other ways – when they got word to do so.

And so begins the slow upward climb of this story. The passage made me cry. It was well-delivered by the audiobook crew, and I had forgotten it.

I will let you draw your own analogies. The plot could be fit into our own times. Who is the recruiter, who are the recruited, and what is the enemy? You will have to work these things out for yourself.

Have you read Mission Earth?

12 February 2016

Mission Earth is a story written by LRH in 1985, and subsequently published in ten books, spaced out so audiences had time to finish each one before the next one went on sale.

I owned a full set at one time, but only read the first 5 volumes. More recently I purchased the audio books version and finished the story that way. Here is a rather off-the-cuff sum-up of what I took away from reading these books.

Viewpoints

The first 8 volumes of the story are narrated by the hero’s chief antagonist, a spy from another planet. First viewpoint.
It is presented as a transcription of his “confession,” written after he was imprisoned for his misdeeds. A robotic translator is used in this process, and it makes comments about the illogical nature of the story at the beginning of each book. Second viewpoint.
The spy has secretly installed implants in the hero and the heroine, giving him direct access to their conversations and experiences. Thus we also get the hero’s viewpoint in this story.
The last two volumes are ostensibly penned by an “investigative reporter” from the same planet as the other main characters. He starts out sympathetic with the hero, but gradually gets corrupted by his baser instincts and ends up something close to a raving lunatic. This character gives us the ending of the story, after they have all left Earth and returned to their own planet.

The hero’s viewpoint is very ethical. It is despised by the narrator, a criminal, and that gives us our satire. Though the subject of the books seems to be Earth, it is more correctly the human predicament, which the other planet suffers from as much as Earth does, even though that planet has a continuous written and legal history that goes back tens of thousands of years, and technology very advanced compared to that on Earth.

Hubbard’s hero speaks for Hubbard in terms of ethical and practical answers to a variety of thorny human dilemmas. He briefly explains all sorts of advanced technologies that for all I know are perfectly workable.

The criminal narrator cheers for the unethical side of human thought and experience. He is quite willing to be involved in the most unseemly behavior, particularly involving sexuality, but also murder, and adores the subjects of public relations, psychology and psychiatry.

Technologies

Here is a short list of technologies mentioned in this story. It is my definite impression that he is telling us that these technologies are quite real and have been used by more advanced civilizations for thousands of years:

  1. Superluminal travel. This is exemplified by a technology he calls the “will-be-was engine.”
  2. Safe biological handlings for pollution. The hero runs a “spore project” to rid Earth of excess pollutants.
  3. Time bending. The hero has a camera-like device which can be dialed up to several hours into the future that he uses to win at roulette in a casino. The royal city on the home planet is also protected by a 13 minute time warp.
  4. Anti-gravity drives, which are quite the ordinary thing on the home planet.
  5. Harnessing of microscopic “proto black holes” as long-term energy sources. The hero does one for earth, and Royal City on the home planet also runs on one.
  6. All sorts of energy-based weapons, of course. Though the criminal’s favorite gun shoots needles.
  7. Mind control via hypnosis. The heroine is expert at this and uses technology called a “hypno-helmet.” The hypnotic effect is well-known on earth, though seldom discussed in “polite” company.

Social dynamics

Hubbard depicts all his characters as fallible. Even the robo-brain in the translatophone. Thus, human societies, to survive, must somehow take this into account.

Both societies suffer from two propensities in particular: drugs and sex. What the hero tries to do with these subjects is to decommercialize them as much as possible so there is no profit in promoting them. This strategy seems to include a minimum of legal prohibitions.

All societies have problems with criminality, and this is really the central theme of this story. Many people, including me, found these books hard to read because criminality is so in your face in this story. The intent, of course, is to get us to face it. A society that cannot face a criminal and deal sternly with one will be overcome by them. This is one of the primary lessons taught by my church and one of the most hardest fought (by the criminals, of course). Criminality has been SO TOLERATED on this planet for so long! Hubbard really makes fun of this fact and its various ramifications. New York City is run by the mob, which does the dirty work for the secret ruler of the planet, Rockefeller (dubbed “Rockecenter” in the story). Everyone has to do what this guy says or else. The mobs, however, have better ethics than the Rockecenters! Some other criminal rackets Hubbard deals with in this story include:

  • Credit card companies and banks.
  • PR as it is commonly practiced on earth.
  • Psychology and psychiatry as they are practiced on earth.
  • The program to make homosexuality popular, as a population control strategy.
  • Rampant spying by the government on private citizens.

Hubbard’s interim answer to social ills is to face and handle the criminal very sternly. This should be the focus of law and the primary duty of the central government. We are talking about real criminals, not all the people who make mistakes. The real ones do it with a passion. The others feel upset about their misdeeds.

On Earth the criminal “Rockecenter” is forced to sign over all his operations to honest people. Then when he attempts a predictable double-cross, he gets blown up, and all the signed papers recovered.

On the home planet, the criminals get exiled to barren regions with “lots of space.” They cannot be rehabilitated and in any case are not seen as worth the effort. Perhaps the next lifetime will be a better one. On the home planet people live for 200 years or more, so imprisonment of criminals (in a big open area) until death can give a society a nice long breather.

Earth versus ET

In this story, the hero’s home planet is planning to invade earth and take it over about 150 years in the future. However, surveys have indicated that the planet may not survive that long. The hero is given a royal order to go “fix up” Earth so it will survive longer. The covert operations office (Coordinated Information Apparatus – CIA) is put in charge of all the logistics for this mission, but has gone corrupt, and is using Earth to grow drugs that it imports to the home planet to use in undermining the power of the royal Lords. So the operative assigned to the mission is given a secret order to prevent the hero from being successful. This story tells us that ET is a problem for Earth, either way you cut it.

His last word as an author

Though other LRH stories have been published since Mission Earth, I believe it is the last story he wrote before he left, and thus his “parting shot.” Ever since he took up the serious subjects of Dianetics and Scientology he has been badgered in “popular” media, yet anyone who has studied these subjects knows how hard he worked on them and understands what a gift they are to Earth. The general public – but particularly those who hope to mold public opinion – deserve the dark satire communicated in this story.

What If: Students were paid to go to school?

15 May 2013

I just heard a story on NPR about how Los Angeles Public Schools decided to no longer suspend students for intentionally violating rules.
Also, TED recently did an event on education and has been publishing those presentations on their site.
So, it all came together for me:

Going to school for a kid is like going to work for an adult.

So, why shouldn’t they get paid?

For a long time, schools were seen as services available to families who could afford them. Then some governments decided that “an education” should be available to every child, and free of direct cost to the families. Eventually, many governments made going to school for children below a certain age compulsory. We can only assume that this was to help make the parents (both) available to work in the factories. Politically, it was sold to Americans in the 1920s as a way to “Americanize” recent waves of foreign immigrants. Today, the US compulsory education movement is seen as having anti-Catholic motivations.

Like adults have to work to make enough money to really live, if children have to go to school, that makes it like a job for a kid, doesn’t it? Most kids don’t think of it as a service. Some parents do. Who was really behind compulsory education? It’s hard to say. But due to its cost, I think it must have been someone pretty powerful.

Since the 1970s, I have personally questioned the implied equivalence of education with schooling. In fact, there are many ways to get an education, and only one of those ways is to go to schools, much less public schools. Children are seen as unwilling participants in the process, but that is not really true. They just don’t like being told they have to do something when they don’t see anything in it for them. Some would say that’s part of being a kid, part of getting “socialized.” But that’s a lie, too. It’s just how things are set up here on earth, in most “modern” countries.

Children are just people with small bodies who are encouraged to pretend that they are “stupid” so that they can be “educated.” The whole paradigm is actually quite ridiculous. It serves certain interests, so it has support in some important places. But it doesn’t have to be that way.

If kids could demand to be paid to “work” at school, or choose not to go at all, social life on earth would be a different game. A game, I think, that would have more respect for kids and what they really know.

What If: Higher Education

16 October 2012
what they don't teach in school

What they don’t teach you in school.

My “What If” articles are meant to deal with highly speculative concepts.

This particular article was inspired by a job listing for a teacher for “disadvantaged youth.”

I thought: If those in charge really wanted us to know what we needed to know to “get ahead,” what would they teach us?

And I came up with at least three subjects that are not taught at most schools, but that have helped various persons make a mark on the planet (of some sort or another). These are:

  1. Esoterica. Mystical or Occult teachings and practices.
  2. Military Arts. Usually only taught to soldiers.
  3. Street Smarts. Stuff you pick up when forced to “live tough.”

If you can acquire some mastery of two or more of these subjects (I don’t know that these are the only ones, just what I thought of) and make good connections to some folks involved with those subjects, your career possibilities could open up substantially.

The accompanying diagram gives my rough estimate of what sort of “professions” education in these subjects would prepare you for. Not that I necessarily recommend going in any of these directions. But the fact is, people who seem to be doing quite well seem to know about this stuff, and “normal” people don’t seem to.

In the interest of seeing if this theory has any sort of validity, I looked up some biographies of some famous individuals on Wikipedia and extracted a few salient facts. Formal higher education played a major role in only one of these persons’ lives, and he is by far the lesser of these four personalities.

Benjamin Franklin (January 17, 1706 – April 17, 1790)
Father: Maker of candles and soap.
Schooling: No higher education, learned via reading and apprenticeships.
Street smarts: Ran away from home to Philadelphia at age of 17.
Esoterica: Initiated into the Masonic Lodge in 1731.
Profession: Printer, polymath, statesman.
Criminal dealings: Had a son out of wedlock, and had to take his wife in common-law marriage, as she was previously married. But basically, he seemed to be an honest man.

George Washington (February 22, 1732 – December 14, 1799)
Father: Tobacco farmer and businessman. Slave holder.
Schooling: No university education. Got surveyor and military training.
Esoterica: Joined Freemasonry in 1753.
Profession: Surveyor and landowner, military officer, politician.
Criminal dealings: As a military officer, he killed native enemies of the British colonizers.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild (23 February 1744 – 19 September 1812)
Father: Personal supplier of coins to the Prince of Hesse.
Schooling: No formal education is noted. Learned banking by apprenticeship.
Esoterica: There is a persistent belief that Rothschild financed the work of Illuminatist Adam Weishaupt.
Profession: Banking for royalty.
Criminal dealings: Imported goods across Napoleon’s continental blockade.

Johann Adam Weishaupt (6 February 1748 – 18 November 1830)
Father: Professor of Law.
Schooling: Educated at a Jesuit school and at university.
Profession: Professor of Law.
Esoterica: Founded “Order of Perfectibilists” in 1776, became a Mason in 1777 and developed “Illuminism”.
Criminal dealings: Writings of 1784 considered seditious by Elector (Duke) of Bavaria.

This sampling is not sufficiently broad to prove anything. But I’m really just trying to make a point. The guys in charge of the “education” system: They’re not going to tell you what you really need to know!

What if: You are operating on a false assumption?

23 July 2012

I have written a more general article on the subject of deception at my new blog here. This will be a more specific list of what I think are some of the important false assumptions of our age. – Larry

A being needs stable data to keep from getting confused. The flip side of that observation is that a being will invent stable data in an attempt to recover from confusion.

At higher planes of existence, the exact data used are not that important. A high tolerance for different viewpoints exists at those levels.

But on earth, when one person has a problem, chances are so do many others, and the cause of that problem could be similar or identical for all of them. At our level, the exact datum is more significant, because a datum can be very solid if a lot of people agree with it.

Solid like a wall. Solid like a prison cell. Solid like a bullet.

At the higher levels, bullets go right through bodies. At our level, they hit hard, and hurt a lot.

On earth, the data you operate on can determine whether you find yourself in the line of fire or living peacefully, whether you are taken to jail or remain free, whether you drive into a wall, or stay on the road.

Most of us aren’t too bad at the short-term challenges, but when we start looking longer-term like decades or lifetimes, we tend to have a rougher time.

Do the assumptions we make about life in general or ourselves in particular have any effect on our ability to enjoy life and build a sustainable future? Can they help protect us from life’s tendency to roll over us like a bulldozer?

Here are some examples to consider:

Assumptions about Self

  • I am my body; I live and die with my body.
    This is a common assumption these days. But, what if it weren’t true? Would advertising about how you look, what you wear, what you drink, smoke or drive, where you work have as much effect on you if you were certain that you were not your body, but a being attached to a body? Would you, perhaps, put more attention on the future if you were certain you would be born back into it?
  • There are some things certain people just aren’t good at.
    What if you find yourself in a situation where something needs to be done and you are the only one available to do it, but have convinced yourself that you can’t do that thing? Would giving up really be better than trying anyway?

Assumptions about Sex and Children

  • It is very important to have a good sex life.
    This is related to the idea of being a body. Biologically, sex is for making children. If we are not engaging in it for that purpose, exactly why are we? Though this is not something to argue with people about, I also think that is not something to be anxious over. The goal of having children and raising them is not the only goal worth working for. And the goal of having sex just for the fun of it isn’t that much of a goal.
  • Children are born knowing nothing and totally innocent.
    I have heard well-educated adults state this as fact. Obviously, they have not been around many children. There have been studies indicating that a child picks its personality at approximately the age of 2. Well, what exact “hat” is this child picking this personality out of? The most obvious answer: The “hat” of its own experience! Except: “Modern” science doesn’t grant a child any experience. Civilization on this planet could totally change if we simply started granting children their experience. Listen carefully to one some day, and he or she might share some with you.

Assumptions about Groups

  • Groups are a necessary evil. We’d all be better off as rugged individuals.
    The family is the first group we have to deal with every lifetime. Is the family merely a necessary evil?
    Would you rather live without all modern technologies, systems of law, and modes of companionship just to get rid of groups?
    Could it be that groups are simply poorly understood, but actually quite necessary and worthwhile?
  • A group survives mostly due to the brilliance of its leader.
    Corporations pay CEOs (Chief Executive Officers) millions of dollars a year because they are “so rare.” But a good engineer is only worth 50 grand ($50,000). I suppose those high-paid CEOs would like others to think that they are some sort of demigods (minor deities). Though the more honest will tell you that all they did was develop a system that works. What if anyone could learn such a system? Could anyone then be a CEO? Probably not. But the whole planet would be better off if more levels operated on systems that worked!

Assumptions about the Human Species

  • Humans evolved slowly on earth from lower life forms.
    These days, we have a lot of time and energy invested in this “modern” idea. But is that investment proving productive? I guess it depends on what product you were hoping for: Jobs for scientists, or great steps forward for civilized man. I am not seeing those great steps forward; are you? Maybe we are leaving something out. Look into the Disclosure Project or the Lou Baldin materials, or many similar resources and you will get an idea of what we might be overlooking. And it is pretty major.
  • Humans are alone in the universe.
    Not per the references mentioned above! As things stand we are setting ourselves up for the biggest “surprise attack” of the modern age. We could be investing our time and money in learning all we can find out about all the others out there, how to cooperate with them, and how to catch up with them technologically. Then, you might be looking at some real leaps forward!

Assumptions about other Life Forms

  • Animals are a lot like us, except they don’t know how to talk.
    There is a modern trend towards “humanizing” animals. Well, there’s something to that. Except: It’s not being done with any spiritual awareness. So you are getting all these people who don’t want to eat animals for food because they don’t want to “hurt” them. But what if the human body was designed to eat animals? This desire to be “humane” could create a health problem, which it seems to be doing. But beyond that, we need to know what other life forms really are, how and why they developed, and what is the best way for us to relate to them. We are living in a lot of self-enforced ignorance when it comes to the biological sciences.
  • Higher life forms are unique to earth.
    This is in some ways a re-statement of earlier assumptions on the list. But I want to make a point relating to this: We are leaving ourselves open to the possibility of biological warfare waged from outer space if we continue to insist on the pin-headed falsehood that higher life is unique to earth. There is some evidence now to support the idea that the Black Death of our Dark Ages was brought here via meteors, or similar ET objects. Could something like that happen again? There is also some evidence that many of our deserts were created by explosions of something like ET nuclear weapons. We don’t need more deserts on earth right now.

Assumptions about the Physical Universe

  • Life is a product of the physical universe.
    This is one of the most potentially harmful (evil) false assumptions alive and well on the planet today. It should be exposed as false with as much rapidity as we can muster up. It is central to the dogma of scientific materialism, which is actively preventing useful spiritual solutions to human problems from being put in place on Earth. I know of no other advanced society in the universe that believes this. We need to get over it, too. It is a huge block to our progress.
  • The physical universe has limits that cannot be violated under any circumstances. Those limits include: Velocity of light, conservation of energy, linearity of time flow, gravity proportional to mass.
    Though modern physics now questions these limits, from a spiritual point of view they are largely meaningless. What I like to look at relative to this assumption is what we already know about matter. We know that matter appears solid just because it moves really fast. Like a plane propeller appears like a solid disk when it spins fast. If conservation of energy is true, why hasn’t all matter long ago “spun down” and turned back into slow-moving bits? Where does the energy come from that keeps matter solid?

Assumptions about the Spiritual Universe

  • One cannot visit the “spirit world” until one dies.
    Mystics have been trying to disprove this for years. You’d think with all the documented NDEs (Near Death Experiences) OBEs (Out of Body Experiences) and past life recalls, we’d be over this one by now. But our “real” rulers continue to insist that the spirit world, if it exists at all, is totally inaccessible to mere mortals. This puts an artificial wall between us and some of the major power brokers in this universe. By perpetuating this myth, they make themselves seem “spiritual” when they are probably mostly just people like us. People with anti-gravity space ships, telepathy, and heavy duty mental control technology, but people nonetheless.
  • The heavens are full of Love and Light; the only Hell is here on earth.
    Combined with the prior assumption, this makes death seem very desirable. But I’m not willing to walk into this carnival like a rube. Walk into it we all must, whether death takes us there or some other agency does. Well, if I can find out another way to check it out before my body stops working, I’m going to go for it. I’m tired of surprises and false promises, and this sounds like another one to me.
    If any of you already have this capability and have some intel to share, I encourage you to do so!

Assumptions about the Supreme Being

  • There is a Supreme Being.
    What if this isn’t really true? I mean what if, for all practical purposes, there is no one running the whole show, no one who is responsible for creating everything else? What if the highest level of creation we can really find with any certainty is us? Would that shift some responsibilities around a little? Would that change our concepts of “agreement” and “disagreement” a little bit? Would that leave us holding the bag, so to speak? Well, it might really be that way; at least for all practical purposes.
  • Blind obedience to Source is the best policy.
    After all, God, or the Supreme Creator, or the Heavenly Father, or even one of the guys that works for him, knows so much more about everything than you or me could ever know. Why not trust their opinion about what’s right and wrong, good and evil, fate and choice?
    There is no doubting this: You are a resource, in that you are capable of creation, or production. If you don’t attempt to control what you do in this universe, I am sure someone else has a plan that you would fit into, provided you are willing to obey. Of course, if you show any signs of disagreement with the “plan” you’ll be kicked off the team. How would you like to get stuck on a planet like earth was a million years ago? Did you enjoy being food for dinosaurs back then? (I shouldn’t mention that; most of us weren’t on earth at that time.) If you don’t go for self-determinism, you will get other-determinism. I don’t think there’s any doubt about that.

Who is deluded?

Of course, it could be that all this is my problem and that all these assumptions are actually true. I only ask you to inspect where these assumptions seem to be leading us and to ask yourself if that’s where you really want to go.

If you’re not sure, or think that maybe some bit of the common “wisdom” might be a little off, I advise you to go at it a bit at a time. How much social ostracism are you prepared to endure? Measure your questioning by about that much. But, who knows, you may find new friends by asking some of these questions. And your old friends may not be as willing to dump you as they first appeared.

If you find a real truth, it has its own kind of strength, or maybe you could call it magic. Real truth has the curious ability to elevate the spirit. So some you know may wish to try it with you.