I ordered and received a package of DVDs and books from Dr. Greer’s organization a little bit ago, and watched most of his more recent lectures over the past few days.
These were basically a series of briefings about the politics of the ET situation, the extent of the secret space program, and the suppression of disruptive technologies that could greatly improve human conditions on Earth.
The politics of the situation center around a group of people who were able to gain access to ET technologies and used them for purposes of conquest and threatening more honest and peace-loving people to allow their work to continue (under duress). This is how criminals work.
Of all the researchers in this area, Greer probably has the most reality on how criminal the high-level people in this program are. His research, however, does not include the connection with ex-Nazi Germans.
David Wilcock also has started a new set of shows with Corey Goode that feature the information that William Tompkins has been releasing in his book and subsequent interviews. In the shows Corey comments on how Tompkins’ data align or differ from his own training and information.
Goode, Wilcock and Tompkins all believe that the secret space programs started with some occult German groups who wanted to achieve some sort of technological advantage for their own purposes. They got talked into taking over Germany and starting a war, but decided to bow out of that war by “losing” it and moved their operation to South America and Antarctica. This allowed them to keep their technologies secret and later infiltrate the US corporate and military groups that might be sympathetic to their plans. These connections apparently eventually resulted in what some call a “breakaway civilization.” This group runs mining operations and manufacturing plants on other planets and trades with various ET societies. A sub-group also helps the dominant aggressive ET group in its missions outside this solar system which are presumably military missions.
Greer doesn’t mention this data, and may not, in fact, have been told any of it. Though he reads some books on the subject, he says he does not use the internet to do any research; all his most important data is from his sources, who are mostly government-related, along with a few corporate people and near-royals like Lawrence Rockefeller and Prince Hans-Adam of Liechtenstein.
Most of these New Age guys are into “dimensions” or “densities.” I’m not sure where they got this idea about the “new physics” except that the mathematics of physics uses them. In physics, the “dimension” of Time measures the duration of phenomena or changes of position.
Lots of people are into “parallel time lines,” time travel and other such phenomena. There is also the whole subject of medical restoration expressed as a system for time-regressing a body.
Through all of this I have also been listening to Hubbard’s Philadelphia Doctorate Course (PDC). He touches on these esoteric questions, though in the end, he is trying to train auditors how to audit. However, in this process he presents the simplest view of the situation in this universe that I know of: 1) non-physical points of creation exist; 2) they create effects like matter, energy, space, time and perhaps many others; 3) all creation takes place in present time.
Thus, for me, this talk of “dimensions” and “timelines” along with Meditation and similar “paths to higher consciousness” are all window-dressing for the full range of possible phenomena that can be created and experienced by the non-physical entities which we are. All the action happens in the physical in present time, as far as I’m concerned. All the perception and creation of that action resides with the causative entities which are totally non-physical. Calling biology “life” is a misnomer in my universe. Biology is a creation of life which life is intimately connected to, but it is not life. If it were, biological entities would never die, but they do all the time. Though we can play at being causative through our bodies, what a being can do trapped in a body bears only the faintest resemblance to what one can do freed and fully self-aware.
Who are the ETs and what do they want?
Greer is adamant that if there were “bad” ETs they would have taken this planet for themselves long ago. This reveals his naiveté in these matters. There are plenty of powerful bad guys on Earth. Why haven’t they long ago completely taken over the place and turned it into their dark playground? The answer is that they are in a minority and that the worst of them are so afraid that it is difficult for them do anything effective. For this they depend on higher-toned minions who are less self-destructive and thus more courageous. By a sort of pyramid system of threats of violence they manage to keep a lot of people “in their place” but at the expense of never totally getting their ideal future, always having to compromise with the somewhat saner people they force to cooperate with them. Thus life, in its basic urge to keep the game going, provides a restraining force to the destructive “dark side.”
The “bad” ETs are restrained in their actions by other groups that wish to have Earth surviving more or less as it is now, so as to provide them with a new trading partner, a travel destination, a research area, or something else like that.
Though the “pro Earth” ETs may not want much more from Earth than the various business interests here on Earth want from their customers (sales, so they can show a profit), in public they tend to get over-elaborate in their statements of purpose. This a company promoting “Come alive!” in the 1960s was selling flavored sugar water (Pepsi). And another promoting “the power to be your best” made electronic computing machines (Apple).
I don’t know what most ETs really want, but it would be wise to look past their advertising to their actual products. So far the technology they have “given” us has served our military and criminal sectors very well and the rest of us very poorly. If this is the best they have to offer, I am not that impressed. I know LRH would agree with me.
Yes, their technologies would give us a temporary boost if released for broad public use. But the big question for us – as well as them I do believe – is, can we manage to reverse our own spiritual downward spirals? Can we learn to re-separate ourselves from our material creations, at least when we need to? If this planet were taken from us for some reason, could we recreate our lives on another one? If we are serious about ever ending our slavery to the criminal elements of this universe, those are the questions we must learn to answer.
The Moon landing
By way of a sort of illustration of this dilemma, I offer the example of our 1960s Apollo Program. I believe all the researchers mentioned in my title, bar LRH because I’ve never heard him comment on this, are in basic agreement on what happened during the first Moon landing.
Greer specifically laid this out for us in one of his briefings, and Tompkins has also mentioned it. Our astronauts were not alone when we got to the Moon in 1969. There were several ET ships above them – very close – watching their every move. These ships were videoed. That video has been seen by someone Greer knows. A substitute video of that event was made in advance, as we were expecting those observers. So what we saw on TV that day did not all happen up on the Moon.
We don’t even “own” our own Moon! We have been allowed to develop bases on the Moon and various other places as a secret program under close ET watch. They want to make sure we don’t turn the technologies they gave us against them! And it will continue to be that way until they can trust us, or until they have no alternative but to trust us (that we could turn the tables on them is a rather distant possibility). And so, yet another piece of our cherished history must be re-written before it is reasonably accurate. And so it goes.